Bo dopiero dzisiaj subskrybowałem LKML i nie wiem na co patrzeć.
Hmmm… Ok, zacznijmy od początku. Miałem zacząć wrzucać cytaty tygodnia, tak jak na LWN. Te poniżej mi się podobają, więc pewnie będą ok.
"But we have many many more regressions which are in 2.6.21.x, only nobody's
tracking those. Nobody seems to be fixing them either. Probably
everyone's busy on the 2.6.14 regressions."
— Andrew Morton http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/10/638
"So in that sense, it all sounds perfectly sane. And I'm definitely not
sure your "292 years after bootup" worry is really worth even considering.
When we're really so well off that we expect the hardware and software
stack to be stable over a hundred years, I'd start to think about issues
like that, in the meantime, to me worrying about those kinds of issues
just means that you're worrying about the wrong things."
— Linus Torvalds http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/6/89
Gdybyś przejrzał archiwum, to znalazłbyś pewnie ciekawsze.
1 LogFS take two
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/7/315
2 x86-64 highres/dyntick support
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/6/128
3 Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11(PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE) ???
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0705.1/0205.html
4 gmail is a bit too popular.. (o problemach lkml z gmail)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/7/124
5 CFS 10 i 11 - Ingo miał poprawić płynność gier w nowej wersji
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/7/155
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/8/259
Rzuć okiem na
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0705.1/index.html
możesz przyjąć zasadę, że długie wątki mogą być ciekawe, więc przyjrzyj się im - np ten dobrze się zapowiada
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0705.1/1782.html
BTW Co to jest "sztorm" ??
Powinno być "Czym będzie "sztorm"?". Na razie to jest tak tajne, że nawet ja nie wiem czym dokładnie to będzie. Ale istnieje na papierze i w mojej głowie.
"It just reminds me that the concept of "release early, release often" doesn't actually work in the kernel. What is far more obvious is "release code only when it's so close to perfect that noone can argue against it" since most of the work is done by one person, otherwise someone will come out with a counterpatch that is _complete_ earlier but in all possibility not as good, it's just ready sooner."
— Con Kolivas
